fbpx

An Insider’s Guide to Publishing Research

Table of Contents

Share This Post

Publishing research is an amazing achievement for highschool students, in part because of how hard the process is. Research publication revolves around understanding and contributing new information to a specific field, which can be quite daunting for students who don’t have experience or direct guidance.

We’ve written articles which approach how to write a research paper, and what publishers look for when reviewing papers. In this article, we’ll give you an insider’s view as to what publishing research looks like and means, and how that varies between kinds of publications and between disciplines. This knowledge comes from our research mentors, who are PhDs with long years of research and publication experience across numerous disciplines. Let’s get started!

The Kinds of Publication and Presentation

When we discuss publishing research, we use that as an umbrella term for how research can be disseminated to others in the field, and contribute to the broader pool of knowledge. This can be done in multiple ways; we’ll cover each below, along with notes on how accessible each is to students.

Books

From pop science to textbooks, these are the ultimate expression of research. Professors will spend years working on books, and the amount of effort, original research, and editing required puts them beyond the reach of high school students. For many fields, books are only used to try to popularize concepts otherwise confined to professional circulations.

Peer-Reviewed Journals

These are the backbone of all academic research. Not all journals are created equal, but for most fields (more on that later), research results are published in journals so they can be read and understood by other researchers in that field. These publications are peer reviewed, which means they are critiqued and edited by other experts in the same field. This is seen as a safeguard against poorly designed or conducted research, and ensures the validity of the field. Although anyone can submit their manuscript to any journal, each journal has its own set of criteria and expectations when it comes to the subject matter, type of research (i.e. clinical vs basic), or difficulty. Therefore, journals do not publish all submissions. Not all journals will accept submissions from students, but many will, so long as the research meets their high standards.

Feldschrifts

These are collections of articles which would normally be published in a journal, but are instead published as a book in honor of someone, usually an extremely senior and well regarded researcher in a field. These revolve around a theme, and articles are solicited from notable researchers in the field. These are not open to submissions; we include them here for the sake of completeness. 

Preprints

We delve more into what preprints are, and how they function, in another article. To sum up; preprints are akin to journal articles, but are not peer reviewed prior to their publication. For this reason, they are not well regarded in many fields.

Conferences

Conferences are meetings of researchers and others in a field, organized around a central theme. These have keynote addresses, sessions which give talks on specific issues, and poster presentations. As an example, a wildlife ecology conference may focus on invasive species one year. One session at that conference may be on aquatic invasive species. The poster presentation hall may be divided into sections, for research projects focusing on different themes around the central topic. 

The keynote presentations from a conference will be collected and published in a volume. These are the conference proceedings, which do take some time to publish. Some conferences include only keynote presentations or select poster presentations in their proceedings; in some instances, this is field specific. 

An oral or paper presentation at a conference is a prepared lecture on a topic related to the theme of the conference. Keynote speakers are invited, but all other speakers may join by submitting a proposal. These are evaluated and selected  by organizers of the conference. Proposals not selected for an oral presentation are typically presented as a poster. Poster presentations allow you to hang a poster, and, at designated times, spend time explaining the poster to other conference attendees or judges. An open call for poster abstracts allows for wide submissions for posters. These are a popular choice for undergraduates and high school students. 

Notes on Writing and Publishing

These are a collection of notes which we think are relevant to publishing research, and which are somewhat consistent across disciplines (with exceptions discussed in the next section). 

Coauthors

Almost no papers are published on their own. Coauthorships are used to apportion the credit for work done, and to make sure everyone who contributed is properly acknowledged. If you write the paper, you are one author. If you have a research mentor advising you, no matter if you did all the work writing the paper, they will be listed as a coauthor due to their guidance, intellectual contributions, and editing. 

This continues at all levels of research. Whichever professor is the principal investigator in a lab always gets listed as a coauthor on any paper published by that lab. A graduate student’s advisor is listed as a coauthor on almost any paper a graduate student publishes. A paper published by a research lab will list any researcher who contributes to that paper as a coauthor, regardless of job title or level of contribution. Oftentimes, large papers have multiple labs collaborating together, which can lead to long author lists across multiple institutions or even countries.

Papers which are not based on original research, such as metaanalyses or reinterpretations of existing data often have fewer coauthors. This is also the case for research papers on more theoretical topics, such as math or some branches of physics. These often require a degree of collaboration, but not the amount as needed in lab or field research.

Citations

All research is built off of prior research. Every piece of knowledge or fact that is known was first discovered or reported by someone. Even if you ask novel questions and find novel results, people have asked similar questions before, and it is proper to acknowledge them. Citations come in several different forms:

  • In text citations: these appear within the text itself, usually in brackets or parentheses or brackets, and reference sources very briefly.
  • Footnotes. These are noted in the text, and appear at the bottom of the page. These are used to cite sources, and on occasion to include notes the author found relevant, but tangential to the current discussion of the text.
  • Endnotes. They’re like footnotes, but all at the end of the text instead.
  • Bibliography. These are required alongside whichever kind of citations you use . This is a list of every source used, either in alphabetical order or in the order they are referenced in the publication.

There are multiple correct styles of citation; which you should use depends on where you are publishing or presenting your research. Each has their own requirements so you need to check the exact requirements of the conference or journal you are submitting to. For example, UChicago prefers Chicago style citations.

Nuances by Field

There is an assumption that publishing academic research looks similar regardless of the field. This is inaccurate. While the basics are the same across fields, each has their own quirks. We can’t detail every nuance of every field of research, so we’ll focus on some of the most popular for students, which have intricacies that often trip them up.

Biology

The writing in biology (and scientific research generally) is quite different from the writing you need to do in high school, or from the kind of writing used in other research papers. This is one reason why working with a research mentor is usually important for crafting these papers. By leveraging their experience and knowledge, you can write in the style expected by professionals.

Biology research papers often have a lot of coauthors. Anyone who contributed to data collection/analysis or reagents/materials must be listed. The professor who supervises the lab you are working in is always the final coauthor listed. This can lead to research papers with a lot of listed coauthors, even if the paper was actually only written by one or two of them. 

Finally, biology papers often have extensive bibliographies, even compared to other fields. In the most extreme cases, articles can have a bibliography longer than the paper itself. This is due to the need to cite all related research done on the question before, and the rapid pace of publishing in biology.

Economics

It is very hard to get published in economics journals. Tenured professors publish around one article per year, which is very low when compared to other academic disciplines. The publication process also tends to be very long, even when compared with other fields. You can expect to take at least six months between submission and any possible publication.

Computer Science

Computer science is the fastest field in terms of innovation, due to the speed at which technology evolves. This means that conferences are more prestigious than journals for CS, which is the reverse of every other field. While journal publications exist, most research is presented at conferences, to make sure results are disseminated before becoming obsolete. 

In addition, this makes preprints more valuable in CS research. The most respected researchers often only publish in preprints. That said, most researchers still prefer conferences as venues to showcase their research.

Math

Writing books for professional consumption is more common in math than many other fields. This is because the length of proofs needed for some mathematical research is extensive enough that publishing them as a paper is infeasible. Math papers do exist, and are as prestigious as any other field, but publishing books is more common at higher levels of math.

Final Thoughts

Research is a complex thing to complete, with many field-specific nuances. We hope this insider’s guide has given you a solid introduction to what publishing research entails, and how it can look different based on the field you’re working in. While these differences aren’t as severe for high school students, they do still impact publishing research at that level.

Doing research is hard, especially on your own. The way academia is set up, students progress through stages of mentorship as they get more involved with research and gain more experience and knowledge; that’s why graduate students all have advisors. If you want an advisor for your own research, you should check out our research mentorships. These are great opportunities for students in high school to pursue and publish original research. Schedule a free consultation today to learn how we can help you.

Need help with college admissions?

Download our "Guide to Everything," a 90-page PDF that covers everything you need to know about the college admission process.

More To Explore

Smiling pre-med student in blue scrubs holding study materials, standing in a bright room, symbolizing preparation and success in medical school
Pre-Medical

Pre-Med Programs Top Colleges

Medicine is a very popular career, and we see many students each year who want to pursue it. Many of these students have stellar grades

Three college students studying and collaborating outdoors on campus, representing the process of earning and transferring credits between colleges
College Applications

Transfer College Credit Limits

Students decide to change colleges for many reasons. Sometimes the school they are at doesn’t have the major they want or doesn’t provide the best

Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Monthly Newsletter

Get expert tips, admissions updates, and resources delivered straight to your inbox.

5/5
Wendy Y.
Parent
Below is my son's review. He was accepted to his dream Ivy League school!

From an admitted student's perspective, I am incredibly grateful to have met Sasha - he has been instrumental in helping me achieve my educational dreams (Ivy League), all while being an absolute joy (he's a walking encyclopedia, only funnier!) to work with.

Many people are dissuaded from seeking a college counselor because they think they can get into their desired college(s) either way. Honestly, going that route is a bit short-sighted and can jeopardize your odds of acceptances after years of hard work. The sad truth is, the American education system (even if you attend a fancy private school and ESPECIALLY if you go to a public school) doesn't really tell students how to write a compelling and authentic application. Going into the admissions process alone, without speaking with an advisor, is like going to court without a lawyer - you put yourself at a significant disadvantage because you don't have all the facts in front of you, or the help you need to negotiate the system.

That said, you need a good lawyer just like you need a good college counselor. And that's where Sasha distinguishes himself from the crowd of people claiming they'll get you into Harvard. I came to Sasha worried about and frankly dumbfounded by the college admissions process. I was unsure what to write about and how to go about drafting the essay that perfectly captured my passion, interests, and self. And I was highly skeptical that anyone could really help me. But, damn, did Sasha prove me wrong. From the beginning, Sasha amazed me with his understanding of the process, and ability to lend clarity and direction to me when I desperate needed it. After interviewing me about my background, experiences, activities, outlook, and vision, he helped me see qualities about myself I had not previously considered 'unique' or 'stand-out.' This process of understanding myself was so incredibly important in laying the groundwork for the essays I eventually wrote, and I'm certain I would've drafted boring, inauthentic essays without it.

Looking back, Sasha's talent is that he can see where your strengths lie, even when you don't see them. The truth is, although we don't always realize it, everyone has a unique story to tell. Sasha helped me see mine, and with his big-picture insight I was able to write the application that truly encapsulated my life and vision. He inspired me to dig deeper and write better, challenging me to revise and revise until my essays were the most passionate and authentic work I had ever written. As clichéd as that sounds, that's really what universities are looking for. In retrospect, it makes sense - in the real world passionate (not simply intelligent) individuals are the ones who make a difference in the world, and those are the individuals colleges would like to have associated with their brand.

In the end, I was accepted to the college of my dreams, a feat I could not have achieved without the direction Sasha lent to me. Essays (and the personal narrative you develop through your application) matter so much, and can literally make or break your application. I have seen so many of my 'qualified' friends receive rejections because they wrote contrived essays that didn't truly represent who they were; conversely, I have also seen so many friends with shorter resumes accepted because they were able to articulate their story in a genuinely passionate and authentic way - I fall into the latter category.

As a former admissions officer at Johns Hopkins, Sasha knows what types of essays jibe well with universities, an invaluable asset to have in the admissions process. He is responsive, flexible, creative, positive, and witty. For anyone who is serious about going into the college admissions process informed and prepared, I highly recommend Sasha.
5/5
Arda E.
Student
I used Ivy Scholars to mainly help me with college applications. Within weeks of using this service, Sasha was able to simplify the already complex process. When it came to writing the Common App essay, Sasha didn’t just help with grammar and syntax, he brought my essays to life. Sasha also worked tirelessly to help solidify my extracurricular activities, including research and internship opportunities. Without his help, I would have never had an impressive resume.

Sasha is not only an extremely knowledgeable tutor, but also a genuine brother figure. His guidance, throughout my last two years of high school, was everything I needed to get me an acceptance letter from my dream schools (UC Berkeley, Tufts, Emory).

When it came to testing, Ivy Scholars worked like a charm. Sasha offered a very comprehensive plan when it came to completely acing my standardized tests. Without his test taking strategies I would have never gotten straight 5s on my AP tests and a 35 on the ACT.

Working with Sasha, I didn’t just become a good student, I became a genuine scholar.
5/5
Samson S.
Parent
We worked with Ivy Scholars during my son's senior year. I was concerned that we may be too late to take advantage of college advising but the Ivy Scholars team quickly and confidently directed us through the steps to ensure no deadlines were missed. Sasha's knowledge about schools, what they looked for in candidates, and how to maneuver the application process was invaluable. Mateo and Ryan worked with my son to help him create an essay that would get noticed and I am so appreciative he had their guidance.

Prior to securing Ivy Scholars, we tried using a less-expensive online service which was a terrible experience. As a parent, Ivy Scholars brought peace of mind to an area that was frankly overwhelming. This service was invaluable in the knowledge that we gained throughout the process. He has also met with my freshman daughter to provide guidance for her high school courses, career paths, extracurricular activities, and more.

Prior to signing with Ivy Scholars, I tried a less expensive online service and was very disappointed.

As a result of our work with Ivy Scholars, I am pleased to say that my son will be attending Stern Business School at New York University this fall! I highly recommend Ivy Scholars. Highly recommend!